Since stepping back from full-time royal duties in 2020, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have pursued an independent life in the United States, building careers in media, publishing, and philanthropy. While their decision marked a significant change in their relationship with the British Royal Family, questions continue to arise about how their use of royal titles intersects with ongoing family dynamics.

Public commentary has suggested that the continued use of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles in professional projects may complicate efforts to rebuild closer ties with the Royal Family. However, it is important to distinguish confirmed facts from interpretation and to rely on official sources and documented statements when assessing the situation.

Stepping Back From Royal Duties in 2020

In January 2020, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry announced their intention to step back as senior working members of the Royal Family. The decision, later formalized following discussions with Queen Elizabeth II, resulted in the couple no longer carrying out official royal engagements or receiving public funding through the Sovereign Grant.

As part of this arrangement, Buckingham Palace confirmed that the Duke and Duchess would no longer use the style “His Royal Highness” or “Her Royal Highness” in a working capacity. However, they were permitted to retain their hereditary titles, Duke and Duchess of Sussex, which were granted by Queen Elizabeth II on the occasion of their wedding in May 2018.

The Status of the Sussex Titles

The titles Duke and Duchess of Sussex remain legally held by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Under British constitutional practice, such titles are granted by the monarch and are not automatically removed when royal duties change.

While there is a formal mechanism through which titles can be altered or removed, such actions are historically rare and typically require parliamentary involvement. No official statement from Buckingham Palace or King Charles III has indicated any intention to revoke the Sussex titles.

This arrangement aligns with precedent, as several members of the extended royal family who do not carry out official duties continue to hold noble titles.

Independent Careers and Commercial Projects

Following their relocation to the United States, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex established a portfolio of professional ventures. These include media partnerships, publishing projects, and charitable initiatives under the Archewell name.

Their work has included documentary content, audio projects, and public speaking engagements. In these contexts, Meghan and Harry have been publicly identified by their legal titles, which are widely recognized internationally.

No official royal guideline prohibits former working royals from using their titles in identification, provided they are not presenting themselves as acting on behalf of the monarchy.

Public Commentary and Media Analysis

Royal commentators and analysts frequently discuss the broader implications of the Sussexes’ post-royal activities. These perspectives reflect personal interpretation rather than official royal policy.

Media analysts have noted that the Royal Family traditionally maintains a clear separation between royal duties and commercial activity. Historically, working royals do not engage in personal business ventures, a convention intended to protect the political neutrality and public trust of the institution.

Because Meghan and Harry are no longer working royals, this convention does not formally apply to them. However, commentators have observed that the continued association of royal titles with commercial projects can generate public debate.

Family Relationships and Public Distance

Relations between Prince Harry and senior members of the Royal Family have been described as strained in interviews and published memoirs. These characterizations come primarily from the Sussexes’ own accounts and are not typically addressed in detail by Buckingham Palace, which adheres to a long-standing policy of discretion regarding family matters.

The Royal Family’s limited public engagement with the Sussexes since 2020 reflects an established approach to private family issues rather than a stated policy connected to titles or business activity.

There has been no official confirmation that the use of titles in professional settings directly determines the level of personal or institutional contact between the Sussexes and the Royal Family.

The Role of King Charles III

Since ascending the throne in 2022, King Charles III has emphasized a streamlined monarchy focused on senior working members. This approach was articulated publicly prior to his reign and has guided decisions related to official roles and appearances.

While the King has acknowledged his son publicly on notable occasions, no official statement has indicated a change to the Sussexes’ status or titles. Constitutional experts note that such matters are treated with caution due to their long-term implications for the monarchy.

Public Interest and Ongoing Coverage

Public interest in the Duke and Duchess of Sussex remains high, driven by their unique position as former senior royals living independently. Media coverage reflects this interest but varies widely in tone and interpretation.

Royal historians and constitutional experts consistently emphasize that changes within the monarchy tend to occur gradually and through formal channels, rather than in response to media narratives.

Conclusion

Meghan Markle’s continued use of the Duchess of Sussex title exists within a legally and constitutionally established framework. While commentators may debate how this choice influences perceptions or family dynamics, no official source has confirmed that it directly determines the Royal Family’s level of engagement with her.

As with many aspects of modern royal life, the situation reflects the evolving balance between tradition, personal independence, and public expectation. Any future changes to titles or relationships would require formal acknowledgment from the monarchy itself, rather than interpretation through commentary alone.